Look, we know we've been pretty crap with the blogging lately, so voila: Pecs! and Blingee! in one! You guys are so easy! But wait, who is this hottie?
Meet Greivis Vasquez! Chavista, U of Maryland basketball star, my future boyfriend. A Washington Post reporter followed him back to his hometown, "Caracas" to talk about everything, except politics! B/c his are wrong. So here is an honest-to-mergatroid actual FOUR THOUSAND WORD essay about Greivis, his life, Venezuela, the barrio, and Zero politics. Except:
Three-thousand eight hundred words in, the reporter concludes that, according to one upper class opposition figure currently living in the United States, Chavez has so disappointed the folks in the barrio (except Greivis?) that all Venezuela has to hope for now, is the possible future NBA success of Greivis, the end. Empire.

Comments (15)
Attention all those stalwart defenders of DEMOCRACY who were OUTRAGED at how Manuel Zelaya of Honduras didn't propose extending his term in office, but, well, sort of sounded like someday someone might change the Constitution, but anyway, who cares, CRIMINAL DESTROYING DEMOCRACY!!!
From Colombia Reports:
This is, of course, all the fault of Zelaya, Hugo Chavez, and Daniel Ortega, who used mind control powers to influence federal agencies in Colombia to make it look like Fred Hiatt's perfect Latin American democracy was doing something wrong, which it wasn't, but they will be correcting it soon, because it was obviously rogue criminal elements just trying to make Uribe look bad by getting elected for a 3rd time, though the law originally held that Presidents of Colombia could only hold 1 term. Damn you Zelaya!
Posted by El Cid
|
November 10, 2009 5:06 PM
Posted on November 10, 2009 17:06
Links for CEPR's takedown(s) of F-Rod:
http://www.cepr.net/index.php/publications/reports/how-not-to-attack-an-economist-and-an-economy-getting-the-numbers-right/
http://www.cepr.net/index.php/publications/reports/an-empty-research-agenda-the-creation-of-myths-about-contemporary-venezuela/
http://www.cepr.net/index.php/publications/reports/poverty-reduction-in-venezuela-a-reality-based-view/
Posted by Bunk
|
November 10, 2009 3:33 PM
Posted on November 10, 2009 15:33
Utpal: Yes, the quoted paragraph was from the last few paragraphs of the Post story on the basketball player. I say it like that, because I think one of their editorial hacks read the article and said 'Hey, there's nothing in here that condemns Hugo Chavez as being Stalin-Hitler-Mao, so, go talk to some academic who can tell you they suck.'
Posted by El Cid
|
November 10, 2009 10:51 AM
Posted on November 10, 2009 10:51
@El_Cid: there is a tearing to shreds of that Dominguez article from CEPR (you can find the exchange on their website). Is that paragraph you quoted from the WaPo report? (You can find some old booorevvv posts about that exchange)
Although it is true that the 73 boom also lowered poverty (and yes, many fell back to poverty once the economy stagnated -- per capita GDP actually fell in Vzla over a period of time -- it was only in mid 2008 that Vzla reached (again) the same level of per capita GDP that it had in 1983, for example). Income based poverty measures do tend to depend a lot on per capita GDP, though how much poverty reduction you get for a certain amount of GDP growth can vary a lot.
Posted by Utpal
|
November 10, 2009 9:09 AM
Posted on November 10, 2009 09:09
By the way, Mexico is a huge exporter of oil -- did their poorest classes experience this obvious, pshaw, regular, totally routine uplift from this 'oil boom'?
Hmmm. Apparently the leaders of some of Mexico's largest corporations are getting all socialist and calling for major national development plans over the long term.
So, unlike that shitty Venezuelan economy which, yeah, helps some poor people 'cause of this 'oil boom,' one of the largest corporate leaders in Mexico says that over the past 25 years the Mexican economic model has produced "few results" in terms of growth or job creation.
In the meantime, there are positive signs of general economic growth, albeit "along with poverty and unemployment."
YAY!!!
Posted by El Cid
|
November 10, 2009 8:48 AM
Posted on November 10, 2009 08:48
Wow. Talk about damning with faint praise.
I guess all societies who produced oil had their poorest classes benefit so dramatically during an "oil boom"?
I mean, like, Venezuela, for example, which produced oil even before Hugo Chavez came to power.
I guess there must have been all these other time periods in which so many people were lifted out of the brutest poverty, right? And then they just fell back?
Posted by El Cid
|
November 10, 2009 8:13 AM
Posted on November 10, 2009 08:13
What's with all these commies in Basketball?
A Canadan socialist named "Steve Nash" urges me to read a "worthwhile" interview with Chavez:
http://twitter.com/the_real_nash/status/1346745519
Now this "Greivis Vasquez" (probably Venezuelan for "Ricky Gervais") urges me to recognize Chavez as "his" legitimate President of Venezuela:
http://lasarmasdecoronel.blogspot.com/2009/11/devendra-banhart-and-greivis-vasquez.html
With all these KGBallers flying around the court, you can't trust the league anymore.
I REFUSE THE RECOGNIZE THE RESULTS OF THE NBA FINALS!!
I DEMAND A RECOUNT!
I WANT THE EU & OAS!
What?
The results were legit?!
FUCK THE EU & OAS!!!
Posted by Paul Escobar
|
November 10, 2009 12:22 AM
Posted on November 10, 2009 00:22
The busrides are definitely free. Again, fair enough.
Oppos don't tend to be bused in as much since they all live in East Caracas anyways.
Think I'll send him a letter.
Posted by Vincent
|
November 9, 2009 11:06 PM
Posted on November 9, 2009 23:06
The busride is free though, I think.
Posted by Utpal
|
November 9, 2009 10:53 PM
Posted on November 9, 2009 22:53
I bet the $23 is just bus fare anyway.
BTW, cute guy!
Posted by QueenBina
|
November 9, 2009 10:39 PM
Posted on November 9, 2009 22:39
Vincent: send 'em a letter.
Posted by Utpal
|
November 9, 2009 10:05 PM
Posted on November 9, 2009 22:05
I thought the oppo folks bus in people in favor of its agenda too, no?
Posted by Utpal
|
November 9, 2009 9:58 PM
Posted on November 9, 2009 21:58
From the article:
"The government routinely buses in thousands of people to march in favor of its agenda. Participants are handed free lunches, 50 bolivares (about $300) and T-shirts with "Sí" on the front."
Since when is 50 bolivars $300? Christ people, that one can be done on the Google homepage. 50 Bolivars is about $23 at the official exchange rate, and like $11 at the unofficial rate, which is the rate everyone always uses in media coverage. (Because that's what rich people have to pay if they haven't paid their taxes).
And they don't give them money anyways. Yeah, they give them a sandwich and a t-shirt, but that's fair enough. It's only polite to feed people at an event far from home.
And no - I didn't read the entire article, I just skipped to the end for the part about Chavez.
Posted by Vincent
|
November 9, 2009 9:51 PM
Posted on November 9, 2009 21:51
Am I the only one watching this page garbled? Like, two videos right one after another without any break in between?
Posted by Utpal
|
November 9, 2009 9:37 PM
Posted on November 9, 2009 21:37
I thought Hector Rodriguez (the student leader who "debated" in absentia Goicoechea and gang in the parliament) was your future bf. Which is good, cuz he's mine. You can have Greivis (Vzlans sure have weird names).
Posted by Utpal
|
November 9, 2009 9:22 PM
Posted on November 9, 2009 21:22