Jesus, Brazil, what will it take to make you publicly recognize these fake Honduran elections presided over by a prestigious military junta? Lord knows the pretend voting process has already gotten the stamp of approval by the United States and, let's see, Israel for some reason (WTF?) so why can't you just abandon your fancy "democratic principles" and stop making Barak Obama look like a complete asshole over here, ok?
Fine, whatever. We'll just get the journalists to tell the American people that you've changed your position then, so suck it.

Comments (14)
Be-bop-a-LULA, he's our baby...be-bop-a-LULA, don't mean maybe...
Posted by QueenBina
|
December 3, 2009 8:21 PM
Posted on December 3, 2009 20:21
I am so proud of my president, Mr. Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva!!!
I was reading the Brazilian press--which is every bit as slavish as the MSM in the US, in fact--and most of it was a dirge lamenting «the sad turn in Brazilian diplomacy», bla, bla, bla...
Most of the press in Brazil is shamelessly right-wing and to read Brazilian newspapers and magazines and television is like watching Fox News 24/7.
So, like an equation in mathematics, to get at the truth, all you have to do is put a «-» sign in front of it - (bla-bla-bla)= the truth. So for example:
- («Lula's insistence on the reinstatement of Zelaya represents a setback in Brazilian diplomacy, yadayadayadayaa...») = Lula is doing the righteous thing.
Ordem e Progresso, bitches!!! Kudos to Borev, as always!!!
Posted by Brasil66
|
December 3, 2009 7:52 PM
Posted on December 3, 2009 19:52
I like Correa:
http://www.laht.com/article.asp?ArticleId=348322&CategoryId=14089
Correa, a U.S.-trained economist, said the Chinese representatives asked in the talks that Ecuador list “the inventory of assets” that it will put up “as a guarantee” for the loan and that “the Central Bank put up its assets as a guarantee,” which he called “outrageous things that are really humiliating for the country.”
Thus, he asked for an answer as to whether the two countries “are working as friendly countries in mutual cooperation or (as) rivals” to “make the pertinent decisions, because those funds can be obtained from another source (by) changing Ecuador’s international policy.”
Posted by Paul Escobar
|
December 3, 2009 7:38 PM
Posted on December 3, 2009 19:38
It IS déjà vu all over again...Honduras ca. 30-35 years ago, to be exact.
Guatemala's not a bad comparison either, although there it was Mayans...in Honduras, it's the Garífuna and assorted campesinos that are the most at risk in the eyes of the undeclared junta.
Posted by QueenBina
|
December 3, 2009 1:02 PM
Posted on December 3, 2009 13:02
This is about past events, but contain important revelations about responsibility for Guatemala's scorched earth campaign of the 80s:
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB297/index.htm
Posted by Utpal
|
December 3, 2009 12:19 PM
Posted on December 3, 2009 12:19
They were presided over by a prestigious (or is that notorious?) military junta, but we all know that they were paid with Hillary and Barack's checkbook.
This feels like deja vu all over again.
Posted by jhadstate
|
December 3, 2009 11:16 AM
Posted on December 3, 2009 11:16
Oh, what the heck, here's the extended clip of Laura Carlsen's experience of the AWSUM powr of civil DEMKRASEE in Hondurastan:
This is a completely undemocratic way of silencing dissent.
Clearly the proper, civil, democratic response to this representative of Hugo Chavez and the reincarnation of Joseph Stalin would be to have the army storm her hotel room and put her on a plane to Costa Rica in the early morning hours and then have the Honduran Congress vote to 'promote' a new representative of the Center for International Policy to serve as the interviewee for news media.
The U.S. would immediately send down its troubled but happy congratulations for the CIP's new spokesperson and insult Carlsen for causing all this mess in the first place.
Posted by El Cid
|
December 3, 2009 11:03 AM
Posted on December 3, 2009 11:03
The truly objective "observers" in Honduras to sanctify the coup are not pleased when someone in Honduras talks on the TV machine and says stuff they don't like.
The brilliant and beautiful Laura Carlsen writing on 30 November:
Remember -- if you do things unpalatable to the Honduran right, you are by default an 'agent of Chavez', because, you know, shut up, and also DEMOCRACY!
Posted by El Cid
|
December 3, 2009 10:54 AM
Posted on December 3, 2009 10:54
¿Qué tiene Meeeeel?
¡¡Que la burguesía no puede con él!!
Posted by Utpal
|
December 3, 2009 8:15 AM
Posted on December 3, 2009 08:15
And we all thought Hugo would be the one to corrupt sweet, pragmatic Brazil...
It turns out the red Caballero's no match for Mel's badass Stetson!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLABCYO3tO4
Manuel makes the good-left go bad!
[He makes Brazil go baaadddd!]
Lula was hangin' in the corner his lame-ass gringo friends!
He heard that Mel was trouble, but he couldn't resist...
[Good left goes ehhh!...ehhh!!...ehhh!!!]
Mel Zelaya makes the good-left go baaaaddd!
Posted by Paul Escobar
|
December 3, 2009 7:56 AM
Posted on December 3, 2009 07:56
BTW, check this out:
http://hondurascoup2009.blogspot.com/2009/12/mayoral-update-san-pedro-sula.html
The total vote in San Pedro Sula alone promises to be lower than the lowest of the lowball estimates. Hmmm...
Posted by QueenBina
|
December 3, 2009 12:02 AM
Posted on December 3, 2009 00:02
Apropos Honduras and Brazil, get a load of this:
http://www.vtv.gob.ve/videos-emisiones-anteriores/26837
Watch the segment with Mel, in particular--about 9 minutes in. He makes it clear that the Honduran congress does not have the powers to depose OR restore a president.
In other words, this is illegal from toppum to bottomus.
Posted by QueenBina
|
December 2, 2009 10:12 PM
Posted on December 2, 2009 22:12
Didn't my LORD deliver Daniel deliver Daniel deliver Daniel ... and why not everyman ...
Posted by Utpal
|
December 2, 2009 8:52 PM
Posted on December 2, 2009 20:52
Fruity flag: WIN!
Posted by QueenBina
|
December 2, 2009 8:49 PM
Posted on December 2, 2009 20:49